At 11:40 AM PST, the vehicle launched successfully from Polar Station. At 11:44 am, the booster section failed to separate completely from the rest of the launch vehicle. The vehicle immediately deviated sharply from course. A determination was made at 11:46 am that the vehicle was unrecoverable, and an emergency ejection was ordered. Santa and all nine reindeer were successfully rescued downrange, but the remainder of the payload, including gifts for all the good girls and boys of the world, was tragically lost. And that, kids, are why you’re getting office supplies this year.
There’s a lot to admire about the LinkedIn iOS app. But there’s also an egregious flaw, and I’m not convinced it’s accidental.
When you read a link someone has shared on LinkedIn, and you want to share it yourself, you’re out of luck. The only way you seem to be able to share from the LinkedIn app is on LinkedIn.
Which is how other apps like Twitter and Facebook handle things, too, but LinkedIn takes it a step further: you can’t open the link in Safari, an option those other apps offer pretty prominently.
What’s worse (unless I’m missing something, and I’ve tried this six ways from Sunday) you can’t even copy the link to the clipboard. If that’s more than just an oversight, it’s presumably to keep users and the links they share firmly within the LinkedIn corral.
Well, good luck with that. I can’t speak for the rest of their user base, but this dramatically lowers the app’s usefulness—and, by extension, LinkedIn’s appeal—to me. When I find something great, I like to share it widely, and often that means outside LinkedIn’s pinstriped walls.
Which is where I imagine I’ll be spending more of my time if this doesn’t change. Not because I’m storming off in a huff—but I like to spend my time where I get the most value. And come to think of it, that’s a principle shared by a lot of LinkedIn’s core users.
If there’s something in the interface I’ve missed, please let me know. I don’t want to think an app for a network I’ve found so useful would be this petty.
Nimona and Beezus.
A little fan art. Check out Nimona if you haven’t already. It’s fantastic (and has my kids’ seal of approval as well as mine).
25 years ago yesterday, #wemadehistory. Thank you, Audrey.
My LinkedIn homepage is becoming a stream of inspirational quotes and images, which normally just makes me scroll that much faster. (Every once in a while, one will fly in under my radar, avoid my ground-to-air cynicism and uplift me for just a moment before the guard dogs tear it to shreds. But it doesn’t happen that often.)
But on Tuesday, this one caught my eye:
Something bothered me about it for quite a while (and not just the fact that I couldn’t trace it back to the original artist—let me know if you know who she or he is). If this hadn’t been a week when issues of race, class and privilege are weighing in pretty heavily, it might not have struck me… but this time it did.
And it’s the fact that for some people, that “leap of faith” gap is a lot wider than for others. For some people, the consequences of a fall are a lot more dire than for others. And it’s presumptuous, even irresponsible, to ignore that fact.
So with due respect to the original artist (whom I’d love to credit), I’ve been a little presumptuous myself, and amended the original.
Scott Stratten’s eagle eye caught something odd about Bell
Mobility’s Canada’s new app:
Not only do they all seem like Bell Canada employee reviews, they have all been voted “Helpful” so they come to the top of the default review listing. All of these profiles have either reviewed only this app, or two apps, the other being Virgin Mobile’s new app, launched on the same day. Could it be a coincidence that all these people just share the same names as Bell Canada employees?
I hereby dub this phenomenon “appstroturfing.” (There are royalties on neologisms, right? No? Dammit.)
Instead of repeating what many others have said, and better than I could (holy crap, that book was sexist!) I have a few thoughts on BarbieBookGate that touch on Mattel’s response. I’ve posted them over at Medium; the gist of it is that “when Barbie does a better job of talking like a human being than her makers do, something’s gone wrong.” Continue reading